Face antispoofing using comparison of LBP histograms
| dev_eer | 0.366667 |
|---|---|
| dev_eer_threshold | -0.190719 |
| dev_far | 0.366667 |
| dev_frr | 0.366667 |
| test_far | 0.34 |
| test_frr | 0.45 |
| test_hter | 0.395 |
| dev_numNegatives | 300 |
| dev_numPositives | 60 |
| test_numNegatives | 400 |
| test_numPositives | 80 |
| dev_scoreDistribution | |
| test_scoreDistribution | |
| dev_roc | |
| test_roc |
Histograms of LBP features are computed for the samples in the training-set. From these histograms, mean-histograms are computed for each of the two classes: real, and attack. Given a new probe, a histograms of LBP features is computed for the probe, and this is compared with the mean-histograms of the two classes. The probe is assigned to the class closest to it, based on the chi-square distance for histogram-similarity.
This method is described in the paper by Chingovska et al:
@INPROCEEDINGS{Chingovska_IEEEBIOSIG2012_2012,
author = {Chingovska, Ivana and Anjos, Andr{\'{e}} and Marcel, S{\'{e}}bastien},
projects = {Idiap, TABULA RASA},
month = sep,
title = {On the Effectiveness of Local Binary Patterns in Face Anti-spoofing},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group},
year = {2012},
}
| Updated | Name | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan. 5, 2017 | sbhatta/replay_antispoofing (PAD experiments using ReplayAttack database) |